CBS AIRS DR. DAVID AYOUB ON
"The Doctors"
Monday May 5th
Rickets Vs Abuse.
See Local listings- http://www.thedoctorstv.com/main/local_listings
Dr. Ayoub a renowned radiologist with 23 years experience diagnosed my grandson with neonatal rickets.The DA and the state chose to charge abuse
rather than listen to well founded evidence of a medical condition.
This is happening nation wide. The general public needs to know what is
going on in our family court rooms!
http://voices.yahoo.com/family-court-12572300.html
http://voices.yahoo.com/x-ray-images-determining-abuse-debate-12543725.html?cat=70
http://voices.yahoo.com/shaken-baby-syndrome-fading-time-12574345.html?cat=70
http://voices.yahoo.com/child-abuse-accusations-no-place-mistakes-12531534.html?cat=9
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Friday, April 25, 2014
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
American Academy of Pediatrics is getting close BUT NO CIGAR!
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2014/01/22/peds.2013-3793.full.pdf+html
Article brings up some important items but still ignores the fact that there is no research on just infants age birth to 6 months. Thought it was strange that even with obvious cited research not showing less than 6 moths only, it still damned Dr. Millers for not having any infants under 5 months? Also, there is research available that concludes that birth injuries can cause CML type images, besides the ones sited in the article (breech and club conditions), Also of note, it makes it sound like rib injuries are specific for abuse and at the same time says that birth trauma may cause them. There is also research available that states that Shoulder Dystocia and high birth weight can be responsible for rib injuries. My point for venting is that even though the article has good things, like ensuring doctors check for all other possible conditions it fails in my opinion at clearing up some major issues for those accused of abuse when the infants presenting with suspicious injuries are less than 6 months. Thought it interesting that with the resent article doubting Dr Klienmans research on CML's in the AJR that he was not cited. Yet CML's were several times listed as abuse indicators.
1st- the ongoing battle in the medical community concerning false allegations based on incomplete med research
http://voices.yahoo.com/x-ray-images-determining-abuse-debate-12543725.html?cat=70
2nd- SBS is so ingrained in the minds of so many, yet even with facts showing other causes of injuries the prosecutors are still pursuing the SBS angle
http://voices.yahoo.com/shaken-baby-syndrome-fading-time-12574345.html?cat=70
3rd- So few are aware of the atrocities taking place in our court rooms The Pelletier case is one of thousands nationwide!
PLEASE READ THESE....AND HELP ME GET THE INFORMATION OUT
Article brings up some important items but still ignores the fact that there is no research on just infants age birth to 6 months. Thought it was strange that even with obvious cited research not showing less than 6 moths only, it still damned Dr. Millers for not having any infants under 5 months? Also, there is research available that concludes that birth injuries can cause CML type images, besides the ones sited in the article (breech and club conditions), Also of note, it makes it sound like rib injuries are specific for abuse and at the same time says that birth trauma may cause them. There is also research available that states that Shoulder Dystocia and high birth weight can be responsible for rib injuries. My point for venting is that even though the article has good things, like ensuring doctors check for all other possible conditions it fails in my opinion at clearing up some major issues for those accused of abuse when the infants presenting with suspicious injuries are less than 6 months. Thought it interesting that with the resent article doubting Dr Klienmans research on CML's in the AJR that he was not cited. Yet CML's were several times listed as abuse indicators.
Here are
three articles I wrote since my family was devastated by the state of
Oregon and the court system. We are still fighting the injustice. Our
ordeal happened on Nov 8th 2011.
My
goal is to some how, some way bring
light to an otherwise dark secret. The subject is controversial and the
majority of the population have little knowledge that anything is even
wrong.
1st- the ongoing battle in the medical community concerning false allegations based on incomplete med research
http://voices.yahoo.com/x-ray-images-determining-abuse-debate-12543725.html?cat=70
2nd- SBS is so ingrained in the minds of so many, yet even with facts showing other causes of injuries the prosecutors are still pursuing the SBS angle
http://voices.yahoo.com/shaken-baby-syndrome-fading-time-12574345.html?cat=70
3rd- So few are aware of the atrocities taking place in our court rooms The Pelletier case is one of thousands nationwide!
PLEASE READ THESE....AND HELP ME GET THE INFORMATION OUT
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
TEARING DOWN THE WALL ONE BRICK AT A TIME!
My yahoo articles about false allegations of
child abuse, Shaken Baby Syndrome and the current research on x-rays and
the on going medical communities battles on those subjects has
amazingly climbed to 779 views. Note worthy if only how it allows
me to to know that I have enabled at least 779 people the opportunity
to see what is going on. 779 is not an earth shattering number by any
means. But, hopefully those 779 have friends they have shared that
information with. My relentless posting to hospitals, radiologists, face
book groups( not just those that agree with me), pediatricians,
reporters and many different media sources is something I feel needs to
be done. The subject is taboo. Unless it has effected someone personally
it does not exist. PLEASE REFER TO MY YAHOO PROFILE...http://contributor.yahoo.com/user/1820212/jim_dossett.html
Help me spread the word. Find a child abuse article, copy and paste it to anything you want. It is not for profit I have earned a whopping $1.50 so far. Though I have no ideal how the pay process works. Not interested in the money.
Help me spread the word. Find a child abuse article, copy and paste it to anything you want. It is not for profit I have earned a whopping $1.50 so far. Though I have no ideal how the pay process works. Not interested in the money.
Friday, April 18, 2014
ANOTHER SHAKEN BABY CASE BEING DISBUTED
ANOTHER SHAKEN BABY CASE BEING DISPUTED!!!
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2014/04/17/rene-bailey-shaken-baby-science/7817079/
Until the public becomes aware and educated that sometimes ...SOMETIMES... its not abuse! sometimes injuries that can occur from shaking can also be caused by other means.
District Attorneys and state case workers are so determined to justify their actions that they only focus on the negative instead of the child's best interest. They acquire experts that will only see the old science evidence and argue that the new science is not any good? Really? everyone knows that the judge doesn't want anything to do with cases involving child abuse, as he could make a bad opinion. What judges do is rely on the DA's and the state to handle this and get it off of their docket,
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2014/04/17/rene-bailey-shaken-baby-science/7817079/
Until the public becomes aware and educated that sometimes ...SOMETIMES... its not abuse! sometimes injuries that can occur from shaking can also be caused by other means.
District Attorneys and state case workers are so determined to justify their actions that they only focus on the negative instead of the child's best interest. They acquire experts that will only see the old science evidence and argue that the new science is not any good? Really? everyone knows that the judge doesn't want anything to do with cases involving child abuse, as he could make a bad opinion. What judges do is rely on the DA's and the state to handle this and get it off of their docket,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)